Taking liberties: Canada's booming business of detention and deportation

BY MATTHEW BEHRENS 



Most Canadians would shudder at the thought of women being shackled to their hospital beds after giving birth. Yet that is exactly what happens to a specific class of women who, having come to Canada seeking safety, are detained even though they pose no threat to the public.
Detained refugees experience the trauma of being shackled and chained on their journey to and from medical care and during certain procedures in Canadian hospitals, according to a brief presented to the House of Commons last month by McGill University researchers Janet Cleveland, Cécile Rousseau and Rachel Kronick. In addition, they reported many detained refugees forgo health-care visits for fear of being shackled and humiliated.
This shameful state of affairs represents just one of the many abusive practices currently applied against some of the world's most vulnerable people once they arrive in Canada. It also shines a spotlight on the devastating consequences of both the Balanced Refugee Reform Act passed last year and Jason Kenney's further repressive Protecting Canada's Immigration System Act, introduced last week.
Fallout from both pieces of legislation include increased detention and deportation of those who, through no fault of their own, have become an easy scapegoat in the so-called Global War on Terror. And the Canadian government has not been shy about tarring the millions forced to wander the globe in search of safety as the petrie dish in which the terrorist virus incubates.
As with most aspects of the "national security" economy, detention and deportation is a huge and growing business. Last year, the Canadian Border Services Agency (CBSA) released an evaluation of their "Detentions and Removals Program" that framed their analysis within the context of "securing Canada's borders in support of national security priorities." Over $92 million are annually spent on detention and removal of human beings, the report states, with some $22 million of that under the rubric of "Public Safety Anti-Terrorism." The report, a remarkably lifeless document that doesn't document the fear and terror experienced by individuals seeking asylum, speaks instead to achieving efficiencies in a system designed to ensure "those who pose a threat to the integrity of Canada's immigration laws and/or Canadian society" are detained and removed as quickly as possible. But the report fails, like most of Canada's legislation in this field, to define terms like threats and national security.
Without reflecting on the major faults with Canada's refugee determination system, CBSA concludes that "it is clear that the need to detain and remove foreign nationals will continue." Consequently, one of Canada's fastest growing exports is the traffic in traumatized human beings. Between 2006 and 2011, CBSA carried out 83,382 deportations of women, children, and men, while from 2004-2010, there were 72,000-plus refugees arbitrarily detained. Among those thousands deported were women fleeing male violence (indeed, there are high profile cases of Mexican women who, having been sent back, are found murdered) as well as Roma fleeing a wave of racist violence and state-supported discrimination across Eastern Europe.
Kenney's new legislation reflects the pervasive attitude throughout the immigration bureaucracy that refugees are guilty parties hiding something rather than survivors of war and torture who need counselling and support. The CBSA report, for example, reports the consistent feedback of officers who wish to have better training not to assist those arriving in desperate straits, but to strengthen their cases against refugees at the hearing stage and thereby add notches to their deportation belts.


Notably, the McGill brief found that the hundreds of Tamils who were detained after arriving by boat in B.C. reported that among the most traumatizing of experiences -- having survived a horrific war zone in Sri Lanka -- were lengthy and repeated interrogations by CBSA officers that occurred between 3 and 20 times and lasted as long as eight hours.
The logic of CBSA, however, is that these human cargo are meant to be inspected and, if they do not fit a particular profile, must be stamped "return to sender" before they can access the limited resources available to asylum seekers. Indeed, the CBSA evaluation of its operations stated a general concern that the agency needed to deport as many people possible in short order "prior to additional avenues of recourse becoming available," an admission that the rights of the asylum seeker are considered an annoyance preventing the factory-like efficiency of roundups and removals.
The McGill report further notes 95 per cent of those detained are for identification purposes and concerns about an individual showing up for their hearing, neither of which poses a threat. Many refugees have to come to Canada with false documents for their own safety, but are nonetheless thrown either into a prison or an immigration holding centre which replicates the worst aspects of prisons (complete with razor wire fences, security guards, surveillance cameras, and regimented wake-up and meal times). Detention remains indeterminate, and though the average detention time in 2009-2010 was 28 days, the McGill report notes that, especially for traumatized individuals, even a few days behind bars can trigger symptoms of post-traumatic stress (PTSD) and other debilitating conditions.
Indeed, their study compared the lives of detained versus non-detained refugee claimants and found that the majority of refugees experienced on average nine severe traumas before coming here, from physical and sexual assault to being close to death and the murder of friends and family. Following a median detention of 18 days, over 75 per cent were clinically depressed, two-thirds clinically anxious, and a third exhibited PTSD symptoms. Those detained were twice as likely as non-detained to show PTSD symptoms, while depression rates were 50 per cent higher among those detained.
Meanwhile, a companion report to the McGill study, written for the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) by Delphine Nakache, notes that CBSA does not keep adequate enough records to record variations in age, gender and periods of time in detention. However, the report found CBSA's own statistics reveal 27 per cent of asylum seekers are detained in penal institutions even though less than 6 per cent are suspected of criminal activity or behaviour. Those held in jails are detained for longer periods than those in immigration holding centres, and detainees who become suicidal or exhibit behavioural or mental health issues are frequently sent to jail and placed in solitary confinement, further traumatizing individuals who require counseling, not punishment.
The UN report recommends detention only in the most exceptional of circumstances, and quotes from the respected International Commission of Jurists, which finds that poor and overcrowded conditions for migrants in detention "have regularly been found by international courts and human rights bodies to violate the right to be free from cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment." Canadian courts have also affirmed that alternatives to detention should always be considered by immigration officials, but CBSA, like its brother agencies in the national security apparatus, tends to ignore or bypass such jurisprudence whenever possible.
Kenney's legislation mandating one year of detention without bail for refugees who arrive in Canada by "irregular means," such as by a boat, translates into an increase in the human misery documented above. In addition, the fetishization of "securing" identity documents places refugees at further risk because, rather than accepting a driver's licence or national identity card, continued detention is called for while CBSA seeks ID verification abroad, which could lead to the detainee's ID being disclosed in the home country. Needless to say, investigative detention has been found by the Supreme Court of Canada to be a form of arbitrary detention.
But CBSA continues moving on. While Canadian airlines handle many of the agency's deportations, the search is on for "alternative service delivery arrangements," code for privatization. Among those making a profit off this trafficking in trauma is Skyservice Business Aviation, a firm already on standby whenever someone bound for torture under the secret hearing security certificate process is ready for rendering to a country like Egypt or Algeria.
Skyservice makes great efforts to accommodate CBSA requests for deportation flights, even pulling their medevac aircraft out of rotation if need be. Documents obtained under an Access to Information request reveal an email from Mike Vallee of Skyservice to Reg Williams of the Greater Toronto Enforcement Centre thanking Williams for the deportation business, stating "it is one of the more rewarding (exciting) aspects of life here in the hangar." Skyservice has performed "removals" to such human rights abusing countries as Egypt, Algeria and Somalia (an email with respect to the Somalia flight suggests throwing a "few Kenyans" on board as well.) On other flights, Skyservice will hire members of the Montreal Urban Police tactical squad to escort deportees.
As with all aspects of privatization, controls over issues such as privacy and personal safety of the deported individual are even further debased. In an Albanian deportation, for example, Skyservice writes to CBSA that they need further personal details on an individual being deported, but does that information get shared with a receiving government that will then use it to harass or detain the individual? "The Albanian government must be provided proof that this individual is actually an Albanian," the CBSA memo reads, noting "there have been incidents in the past where the detainee turned out to be from another country."
Refugees and immigrants in Canada have traditionally suffered a lower standard of justice than Canadian citizens, but the precedents created in repressing the former group eventually become a wedge designed to deprive everyone else of their rights. And while thousands of Canadians have rightfully expressed outrage over the fact that the government seeks to monitor all of their Internet communications, the deprivations of liberty increasingly suffered by migrants will, hopefully, similarly shock the conscience of Canadians, spur them to action, and end this insidious aspect of Canada's "national security" strategy.
Matthew Behrens is a freelance writer and social justice advocate who co-ordinates the Homes not Bombs non-violent direct action network. He has worked closely with the targets of Canadian and U.S. 'national security' profiling for many years.

Sounding alarm on labour shortages

BY GARY LAMPHIER, EDMONTON JOURNAL

More than 15 major Alberta business groups say the feds and the province need to do much more to avoid what they regard as a looming labour crisis.
The newly formed Alberta Coalition for Action on Labour Shortages (ACALS) says a projected deficiency of 114,000 workers over the next decade represents a serious threat to economic growth and future government revenues.
The alliance, which has scheduled a news conference today to air its concerns, wants the federal and provincial governments to reform immigration rules and aggressively ramp up efforts with employers to boost the flow of new workers to the province.
The coalition's members include the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (CAPP), Alberta Chambers of Commerce, Alberta
Forest Products Association, Merit Contractors Association, Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters, Canadian Energy Pipeline Association and Alberta Enterprise Group (AEG), among others.
"We want to raise labour shortages to the top of the list of issues facing not just Alberta, but quite frankly Western Canada," says AEG president Tim Shipton, whose group's members employ about 50,000 workers provincewide.
"If there is a (limit) on our future prosperity, it will be labour shortages impacting not just the energy sec-tor but all sectors of the economy, and that's why so many groups are coming together and calling for action now."
Tom Huffaker, CAPP's vice-president, policy and environment echoes that message.
"We all perceive that we have a very substantial (labour) crunch coming, if it hasn't already begun, and there's a strong expectation that it's going to get worse," he says. "Whereas in the past it's been somewhat cyclical, there's a perception this time that it's going to be sustained over a long period of time, and we need to start organizing how to deal with that on a number of levels."
The Petroleum Human Resources Council estimates that 39,000 new workers will be needed by 2020 just to replace those who retire, and as many as 130,000 new energy workers may be needed by the end of the decade.
Other industries are looking at similar shortfalls, with the province projecting the creation of 600,000 new jobs in Alberta over the next 10 years.
At 4.9 per cent, Alberta already boasts the lowest unemployment rate in Canada, and with more than $20 billion of oilsands capital spending this year, the Conference Board of Canada expects the provincial jobless rate to fall to 4.5 per cent by next year. Saskatchewan is facing a labour shortage of its own, with a jobless rate that's nearly as low as Alberta's.
"It's not a crisis for the time being, but it's clearly going to be a chronic long-term issue, so it is a very important, high-profile issue for us," says Huffaker. "Our ability to grow the industry depends on having an ad-equate, high-quality labour supply, and we're really concerned about our ability to meet that."
Although Huffaker, Shipton and others give the Harper government credit for boosting the flow of temporary foreign workers and those recruited under the provincial nominee program, the province it-self wants annual quotas under the latter program doubled to 10,000 from 5,000.
The coalition is also asking the federal government to:
- Change the point system under the Federal Skilled Worker Program (TFWP), so it places greater emphasis on marketplace demand for labour as well as validated employment offers, rather than factors like advanced degrees;
- Expand opportunities for temporary foreign workers to become permanent Canadian residents under the Provincial Immigrant Nominee Program;
Amend the national occupation ? ? codes that are used in assessing workers under both the permanent and temporary immigration streams, so the codes better reflect actual employer needs and a broader range of skill positions;
- Reform the screening processes under the temporary-foreign-worker program so employers can better pre-qualify workers, speeding up the cumbersome application and approval process.
The coalition also wants to see a far more aggressive campaign to recruit skilled workers internationally, something that Australia has done over the past couple of years right in Alberta's backyard.
Federal Immigration Minister Jason Kenney says he understands employers' concerns, but he insists the Harper government is already doing a lot to address them.
"Since we came to office five years ago, the number of newcomers coming to Canada who have settled in Alberta has more than doubled, and we've increased the numbers to Alberta under the provincial nominee program 17-fold, so this is a huge success story," he says.
"One of the key initiatives of our government this year will be significant additional reforms to our economic immigration programs, precisely to address this issue, (including) significant changes to the points grid for the selection of federal skilled workers," he adds.
"But the key thing is this: We'll be making broad reforms to move from a slow-moving, rigid and very passive immigration system to a much faster and more flexible proactive system . . . to complement what the provincial nominee programs are doing."
Kenney says the federal government has also quadrupled its in-vestment in settlement services for newcomers to Alberta. "It's a huge in-crease in federal investment in those services that's not been matched by the province."
glamphier@edmontonjournal.com


Read more: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/business/Sounding+alarm+labour+shortages/6231517/story.html#ixzz1oB3jtqmY

Immigration minister looks to private sector

BY PETER O'NEIL, EDMONTON JOURNAL



Immigration Minister Jason Kenney raised the spectre of European-style tensions over multiculturalism in Canada on Thursday while proposing measures to boost the economic prospects of new Canadians.
His proposals include a greater private-sector role in immigrant selection and, in a move one immigration lawyer said would be controversial, more emphasis on the English or French proficiency of immigrants' spouses.
He also elaborated on his recent warning to provincial governments such as Alberta and British Columbia that he won't expand the provincial nominee program until that program is reformed.
"If we can improve the economic outcomes of immigrants, debates over the degree of their social integration would virtually disappear," Kenney said in a speech in Toronto.
Kenney also said the steps the government has taken to improve the "integrity" of the immigration and refugee system are essential.
"We don't have to look very far to see what happens when that integrity is undermined," he said.
"It's happened across Europe and even to some extent in the United States, where public support for the entire immigration system has fallen after widespread illegal migration and consequent abuse of public resources have gone unchecked.
"I never want to get to that point."
Kenney, after noting the comparatively poor performance of immigrants in recent decades, said he is considering proposals to adjust the points system for skilled workers to put greater emphasis on youth with "high quality credentials."
Applicants with Canadian work and study experience and trades skills should also move closer to the front of the line, he said.
The minister said the federal government will also look at giving preference to applicants with a direct job offer, resulting in the private sector getting a much larger role in the federal skilled worker program.
Kenney said he will reject recent appeals from such provinces as B.C. and Alberta for a higher quota from the provincial nominee program until that system is reformed.
He cited the successes of the pro-gram, noting that 26 per cent of current economic immigrants go to provinces other than the traditional destinations of B.C., Ontario and Quebec, compared to 11 per cent in 1997.
But he said provincial nominee immigrants tend to do worse than nominees under the federal foreign skilled worker program because Ottawa puts more emphasis on language skills.
Kenney also said the provincial pro-grams are in some cases duplicating federal programs, and also expressed concerns about provincial nominee "integrity" due to nominees arriving in one sponsoring province and then quickly moving to another.
"We will not consider increasing a province's allocation under the PN program until it demonstrates that its PN program is directly responsive to labour market needs and does not overlap with federal family reunification or investment streams."
NDP immigration critic Don Davies said Kenney exaggerated the government's progress on reducing immigration backlogs and said the minister has failed to substantially improve the ability of immigrant professionals to get their credentials recognized.
Davies also said Kenney is allowing far too many low-wage temporary foreign workers.
Immigration lawyer Richard Kurland praised Kenney's proposed moves, saying a more "nimble" sys-tem that lets the private sector play a bigger role is replacing the old "supertanker" model.
But Kurland said a move to a British-style requirement that spouses should speak one of the official languages will cause a stir.
And he said Kenney will also cause provincial governments some grief by pushing them out of the investor recruitment field, demanding tougher language requirements and perhaps setting up monitoring pro-grams to ensure immigrants don't immediately leave the province that's sponsored them soon after arrival.
Fraser Institute economist Herb Grubel, a prominent critic of the system, said allowing companies to play a bigger role in selection will improve immigrants' performance. But he had some words of warning.
"Will there be a minimum level of pay the employers have to offer? We do not want to be flooded by un-skilled workers whose incomes are low," he wrote in an email.
Poneil@postmedia.com Twitter: @poneilinottawa Read my blog, Letter from Ottawa, at edmontonjournal.com/oneil


Read more: http://www.edmontonjournal.com/news/Immigration+minister+looks+private+sector/6239313/story.html#ixzz1oB378VXg

Lamphier: Ottawa torn on Alberta’s labour woes

BY GARY LAMPHIER, EDMONTONJOURNAL.COM 



EDMONTON - Jason Kenney says he has heard the alarm bells ringing, loud and clear.
He knows Alberta’s oilsands-powered economy is on the cusp of another serious labour crunch, with a projected shortage of 114,000 workers over the next decade.
A coalition of 19 Alberta business groups hammered that message home yet again this week, calling for more action from the feds to avert what they see as a looming crisis and a serious threat to the province’s prosperity.
As Canada’s citizenship and immigration minister, Kenney says he’s working hard to address the gap, in part by tweaking the immigration points system so more skilled workers can get into the country.
“The key thing is to reform our programs so we get more bang for the buck, so we’re attracting those newcomers who aren’t going to be stuck in survival jobs, but are rather ... filling those critical labour shortages,” he says.
“That’s what is going to be driving the reforms we make this year, and I think the provincial governments and the employers will be delighted with these reforms.”
That remains to be seen, of course, since no specific proposals are on the table just yet.
In the meantime, Kenney is hearing much the same message from Alberta Premier Alison Redford, who was in Chicago this week, talking up the oilsands’ ties to the region’s big refinery complex.
“Of the five major refineries around Chicago, 70 per cent of what they’re refining is Alberta crude, and there’s anywhere from 70 to 100 local companies manufacturing or providing services directly related to the oilsands. The trade both ways is in the billions of dollars,” she says.
“In every discussion we’ve had we’ve talked about (Alberta’s labour needs), and that … we are probably looking to fill about 100,000 jobs,” she adds. “When we say that, their eyes just pop out because in some places down here they’re at 20-per-cent unemployment. They really want those people to be able to come up.”
To facilitate that, Redford says she is working with Chicago’s mayor, the governor of Illinois and the Canadian consulate to put together a pilot project to pre-certify U.S. workers for jobs in Alberta.
“What’s great about what Jason Kenney wants to do is, he’s really talking about reforming the immigration system so that in the long term, we’re able to actually identify skilled workers who can emigrate to Canada and do the work,” says Redford.
“But while that is a laudable goal, there are some immediate needs. We have to ensure that we’re not exacerbating another inflationary cycle in Alberta. So that’s where we would like to take the discussion, and we’ve begun to make that case.”
In other words, Redford is clearly worried that the sizzling pace of new energy developments in Alberta will soon outstrip the supply of workers, despite Kenney’s efforts, setting the stage for a repeat of the frenzied conditions that prevailed before the last boom ended.
Alberta can jump up and down all it wants, but that won’t change the facts of life in Ottawa. The feds move at glacial speed at the best of times, and often face conflicting regional pressures.
What’s seen as crucial to the economic well-being of one region may be anathema to another, and that can undermine the case for bold policy action.
While Alberta and Saskatchewan are both desperate to secure more skilled workers for their booming resource industries, Central Canada doesn’t share the same preoccupations.
Jobless rates currently top eight per cent in both Ontario and Quebec — where most new immigrants settle. What’s more, Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty has fingered Alberta’s oilsands, the engine behind Canada’s soaring petrodollar, as a prime cause of his province’s economic woes.
All of which puts Kenney between a rock and a hard place. Which may explain why he remains cautious about opening the floodgates to more foreign workers, despite the glaringly obvious needs in Western Canada.
In particular, he is reluctant to give the provinces the power to bring in more workers under the provincial nominee program.
“Since we came to office we have gone from about 4,000 to about 45,000 provincial nominees across the country, and Alberta has had the lion’s share of that growth,” he says, “And Alberta wants to double it again, Saskatchewan wants to double it, and every province that has a PN (provincial nominee) program wants to double or triple it,” he adds.
“But Canadians are telling us that immigration levels are already high enough, or too high, consistently in every poll that I’ve seen in the past two or three years. That’s right across the country, including the West. So basically, I think it would be irresponsible for any government to massively expand immigration that goes beyond the capacity of Canadians to integrate newcomers.”
That aside, Kenney argues the immigration system alone can never fix all of Canada’s — or Alberta’s — labour issues. Much more needs to be done to increase employment among First Nations communities, and in regions of the country where jobless rates remain high.
“Too many young Canadians don’t seem interested in the skilled trades or doing basic labour anymore. We need to do a much better job of getting young Canadians and aboriginals in the workforce, and people in those parts of the country with high unemployment. That’s got to be part of the solution, too. It’s not just about immigration. It’s about domestic labour market policies.”
I asked Kenney if that points to the need for reform to Canada’s employment insurance system, which offers richer benefits to jobless workers in regions where there is chronically high unemployment, thus discouraging them from moving to places like Alberta. But he had to run, so I never got an answer.


Read more: http://www.canada.com/business/Lamphier+Ottawa+torn+Alberta+labour+woes/6243743/story.html#ixzz1oB2iOicL

Marriage fraudster finally deported


Ottawa woman says case was worth it if system changes

 
 
 
 
Lainie Towell married Fode Mohamed Soumah of Guinea in 2007. He left her three weeks later and was deported this weekend.
 

Lainie Towell married Fode Mohamed Soumah of Guinea in 2007. He left her three weeks later and was deported this weekend.

Photograph by: Pat Mcgrath, The Ottawa Citizen , Ottawa Citizen

It is one of the unsavoury secrets of Canada's immigration system. Each year hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Canadian women and men marry foreigners and agree to act as sponsors for them in Canada, only to find themselves abandoned once that spouse is in the country.
This past weekend, however, one of those marriage fraudsters got his just desserts thanks to a spouse who refused to be a victim. Lainie Towell's ex-husband, Fode Mohamed Soumah, was by all accounts deported back to his native country of Guinea in West Africa.
He had walked out on his 2007 marriage to Towell three weeks after uttering his wedding vows, but it took more than three years for the Canadian Board Services Agency to get him on the airplane after he used every avenue of appeal.
Officials in the office of Public Safety Minister Vic Toews, who is responsible for the CBSA, did not respond Monday to queries about the deportation. However, Towell said Monday she heard from "a couple of good sources" that Soumah had left the country. "I'm confident he's gone, based on information from people who would know."
What does she think now? "It's not something I would have wished for," she said. "This was the man I married and I thought we would build a life together. But it was worth it if this outcome is going to change the system to help others."
That the system needs change is unquestionable. Estimates are hard to come by, but Julie Taub, a long-established immigration lawyer, estimated the number of cases of immigrant marriage fraud ran into "thousands."
"I get about two or three calls a week on this, but I can't take them all on," Taub said.
"I have many clients whose complaints I have passed on to the CBSA. These cases are a rip-off of the Canadian taxpayer."
They are also emotionally wrenching. The fraudsters prey on and betray the fundamental human need for love and companionship without, as it seems, any moral compunction. "It's all about playing on human frailty," Taub said. "All of (the clients) without exception are lonely, susceptible and want to meet somebody.
"There are older Canadian men who fall for young Russians or Chinese and agree to marry them despite the huge age discrepancy, and then the women walk out on them. There are women who are divorcees, never been married, older, and who are thrilled that they have found someone who is romantic and courts them. All these people are victims."
Towell's experience is likely typical. A well-known Ottawa dancer and performance artist, she married Soumah in April 2007 in his hometown of Conakry. She had come to know him after first visiting Guinea in 2004 to study dance traditions. Subsequent trips demonstrated their devotion to each other, or so she thought. As Towell later discovered, Soumah had fathered a child with a 15-year-old girl before leaving Guinea to come to Canada.
After they got married, Towell started the application process to bring her husband to Canada. He arrived on New Year's Eve 2007. Three weeks later, he left for Montreal, saying he wanted a divorce and warning her that, if she made a fuss, he would start collecting welfare that she would have to repay the government. As Soumah's sponsor, Towell signed a contract with Citizenship and Immigration Canada that made her financially for Soumah for three years even if the marriage failed. If he received any form of social assistance, she'd be on the hook.
"Imagine what it was like," Towell said. "I brought this man home and introduced him to all my friends and my family, all my dance students. Then my prince turned into a frog, and I'd been defrauded. I felt completely ashamed and embarrassed."
Perhaps so, but Towell did not play the passive victim. She complained to the immigration ministry, but it wasn't until she went public that government officials began to pay attention. At one point, she donned her white wedding dress, strapped a door on her back and crawled up the steps of Parliament Hill.
Not surprisingly, the stunt attracted attention. Towell soon heard from others who had also been victims of marriage fraud, asking for help and advice. Women's groups and other advocacy started showing up at Immigration Minister Jason Kenney's town hall meetings to demand regulatory changes.
The wheels started to turn. The immigration ministry enlisted border services enforcement officers to investigate cases of alleged marriage fraud. According to news reports, the border agency opened nearly 40 criminal cases of suspected marriage fraud from 2008 through to the end of 2010. It also received roughly 200 leads on possible marriage fraud cases in that same time period.
Last year, Kenney proposed new regulatory measures to prevent people from using marriages of convenience to circumvent Canada's immigration laws. The proposed changes include a five-year ban on the sponsored spouse being able to sponsor another mate in order to stop people from engaging in cyclical marry-sponsor-divorce schemes. There would also be a two-year conditional residency requirement to ensure relationships were legitimate before granting permanent residency to the sponsored spouse. As well, the minister said he would increase the number of investigators and resources to go after fraudsters. These regulatory changes are under review.
Kenney's press secretary, Candice Malcolm credited people such as Towell who came forward with their stories for helping to bring about the regulatory changes.
"Minister Kenney became aware of marriage fraud through some high profile cases, as well as from individuals who came forward during various town halls and consultations to alert the minister of this problem and the suffering it causes for victims.
Regulations similar to those in the works in Canada have long been in place in other countries such as the United States and Australia.


Read more:http://www.ottawacitizen.com/life/Marriage+fraudster+finally+deported/6147846/story.html#ixzz1oAyhnW00

British expats rate Canada top place to live in annual survey


Canada is tops for British expatriates, according to a survey by the UK's NatWest Bank.
For the third straight year, Canada has ranked No. 1 on the NatWest International Personal Banking Quality of Life Index, Reuters reports.
The fifth annual survey of 12 countries put Canada ahead of New Zealand, Australia, France and South Africa. Other rankings in order were Portugal, Spain, the United States, United Arab Emirates, Singapore, Hong Kong and China.
British expats valued Canada's natural beauty, multicultural society, universal health care and security.
"Our quality of life index - which examines expats real life perceptions and experiences and gauges their personal assessments - shows the global financial crisis has failed to
dampen the spirits of expats who seem to have adopted the 'keep calm, carry on' philosophy," Dave Isley, NatWest's head of international personal banking, told Reuters.
Emirates 24/7 reported 82 per cent of those surveyed ranked Canada as having the best quality of life experience. Some 88 per cent said our multicultural society was a factor, while 90 per cent mentioned healthcare and 96 per cent said Canada's human rights and freedoms allowed them to feel safe and secure.
Canada also topped NatWest's Well Being Index, which comprises six self-assessment categories: state of health, degree of prosperity, sense of belonging and acceptance, life satisfaction, sense of achievement and overall level of happiness.
"The quality of life factors that contributed to its number one spot in the rankings yet again range from the culture, standard of living, sense of belonging, work/life balance, equality of opportunity to the state of the economy and financial security," Isley said of Canada.
Despite the financial turmoil of the last few years, British expats in Australia, Canada and New Zealand reported their financial position had "improved significantly," said Reuters.
Those who left Britain for European sun spots are seeing their disposable income eroding as Euro-zone countries implement austerity measures, according to the index.
"Those who are most likely to return home are those who retired to France, Portugal and Spain as their disposable income diminishes and the cost of living rises," Isley said.

Why is Canada keeping out China’s rich?


 Mar 2, 2012 – 7:16 PM ET
TEH ENG KOON/AFP/Getty Images
TEH ENG KOON/AFP/Getty Images
Masses of wealthy Chinese, their money huddled in less-than-secure foreign assets, are yearning to breathe the free air of Canadian capitalism. But Canada doesn’t seem to want them much.
Brimming with the spoils of a historic economic expansion, Chinese millionaires by the tens of thousands wish to make Canada home for their families and their private wealth.
The Canadian immigration system has a program in place to grant rich foreigners permanent resident status, provided they first hand over a six-figure sum to the federal government.
By almost all accounts, that program is broken. It’s rife with delays, an enormous backlog of files and misallocation of funds — all providing fodder to critics who characterize the Federal Investor Immigrant Program (FIIP) as a cash-for-visa scheme that enriches banks while providing little benefit to the country.
Two years ago, the federal government suspended the program, then reinstated it with double the financial requirements and a cap on new applications of just 700 a year.
Would-be immigrants filed their submissions to an intake office in Sydney, N.S., beginning July 3. The quota was reportedly met soon after the office opened in the morning. Of the 700 applicants, 697 were from China. FIIP was then effectively shut down for another year.
Proponents of so-called “economic immigration” say Canada is forgoing billions in foreign capital and untold economic growth by limiting the intake of rich newcomers.
Canada approved 3,223 applications in 2010, representing a total of 11,715 people including children and spouses. That’s a paltry figure in the context of Canada’s annual immigration quota of 250,000, says Richard Kurland, a Vancouver-based immigration lawyer and policy analyst.
“It just makes sense to take their money and allow them to consume Canadian goods and services at a time we need it most,” Mr. Kurland said. “They’re buying houses, they’re buying cars, they’re buying consumer goods.” Just what finance ministers across the country are hoping consumers start doing more of.
The Li family (who asked that their real name not be published) is one example of instant economic benefit. Since arriving in Montreal through Quebec’s version of the immigrant investor program in 2005, the family purchased a home in a wealthy suburb of the city, enrolled their son in a private school, and acquired a hotel employing about 20 people.
“I was considering my son’s education and the fresh air, because he has asthma,” Ms. Li said.
Her concerns with pollution are shared by a growing number of Chinese elite, as are fears of political instability, and security of their assets.
“We worked very hard on our business and we earn every penny. I don’t want somebody to take it back,” she said, indicating the family made its money from a electrical component manufacturing business.
Poaching China’s wealthy is also a short-cut to establishing economic ties with China, said Louis Leblanc, head of immigrant investor programs at National Bank Financial.
“Canada being a resource-rich country dominated by exports, the beauty of this is that you’re creating golden bridges throughout the world with these wealthy families coming into Canada,” he said.
In limiting new FIIP applicants, the federal government cited a backlog of more than 15,000 files.
But those familiar with Canada’s economic immigration system say of equal concern is how immigrant money is distributed.
“The main issue is one of financial accountability,” Mr. Leblanc said. “It’s very hard to figure out how the money is used under the FIIP.”
The program requires applicants to prove net wealth of at least $1.6-million, in addition to an up front investment of $800,000 to the federal government, to be refunded after five years without interest. Ottawa then distributes that money to participating provinces, who are mandated with funding projects to create jobs and subsidize economic development.
The program generated about $680-million in 2010, about 40% of which went to Ontario, another 20% to British Columbia, and the rest to the other provinces and territories. The link between incoming foreign capital and funding for Canadian enterprises through the provinces is crucial to the rationale behind the program. But the provinces have struggled to find ways to appropriately invest this money.
“Some of the provinces aren’t really distributing it, they just hold it for five years,” Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney said in an interview.
“Sometimes, they don’t even pretend to do anything with it. I think Ontario’s sitting on $80-million or more of investor immigrant funds. They haven’t even set up the pretense of a dedicated purpose for those funds,” he said.
Ontario says it has made recent improvements to its program, signing an agreement with Infrastructure Ontario, loaning the agency $149.2-million for 34 projects that generated almost 5,000 jobs. Another $34.7-million funded emerging technologies through the Innovation Development Fund.
Mr. Kenney called that use of funds “notional,” merely “offsetting their interest costs for five years for that money.”
That charge is one of many leveled by the program’s critics.
“I’m surprised they decided to cap it, it might be better to just end it,” said Jeffrey Reitz, a sociologist at the University of Toronto who focuses on immigration. “They’re basically buying visas. There’s little way around that. And I think it strikes people as inappropriate.
“That’s the reputation abroad, too. That this is a way the Canadian government allows rich people to buy their way in.”
Some of the program’s biggest supporters, meanwhile, are participating financial institutions, he explained. The $800,000 upfront loan flows through a facilitator — typically a Canadian bank — then on to the federal government. But the vast majority of investor immigrants opt for a financing program offered through the banks, which front the loan requirement. The immigrant pays the bank a fee, which can amount to $200,000 or more. “That’s the end of the obligation,” said David Cohen, an immigration lawyer based in Montreal. “The applicant never gets his money back. It cost him $200,000 to do this.” Banks also receive a commission on each file, from which agents overseas charged with finding candidates earn their own fee. “It’s a gold mine for the facilitators and for the agents,” Mr. Cohen said.
That system is partly to blame for the deluge of applications, Mr. Kenney said. As is the relatively low financial requirements. While he says he still sees merits to the investor immigrant program, the seemingly unlimited demand is indication that the program is still priced too low, he said.
“The program is underselling Canada.”
The failings of the federal program, however, shouldn’t stain economic immigration altogether, Mr. Cohen said. “There’s no reason to throw out the baby with the bath water.”
Quebec’s program, which operates independently of the federal program, and which isn’t subject to the cap, has established an effective system of distribution its immigrant loans. “It works,” Mr. Cohen said. “It’s one of the few programs that nobody bitches about in Quebec.” Through Investment Quebec, the banks recommends grants to companies with net assets under $35-million seeking help with projects to expand their business. The same kind of system could be applied federally through the Business Development Bank of Canada, he said. Reducing the federal backlog need not be a monumental problem, either.
Raising the financial requirements again or asking for a deposit could limit applicants to those serious about immigrating to Canada. Alternatively, the federal government could consider simply ignoring the backlog. Chinese millionaires with their minds set on Canada could reapply under heightened financial requirements.
“I can’t get excited about a backlog of millionaires, when they can easily access the front of the queue by paying current market value,” Mr. Kurland said.
Once the federal government fixes the program’s failings, it can capitalize on the economic potential of the elite exodus from China. A recent survey found that 60% of China’s U.S. dollar millionaires, now numbering almost one million, intended to or were in the process of emigrating.
“The day you’re convinced that passive economic immigration is of economic benefit, why cap it?” Mr. Leblanc said.
Undoubtedly, there are “millions of millionaires” eager to relocate to Canada, Mr. Kenney said. But their role is limited in countering skills shortages.
“Lending the government $800,000 for five years doesn’t respond to labour shortages and it doesn’t necessarily even respond to the broader demographic challenges,” he said.
But economic integration is becoming a global reality. More and more western countries are courting the wealthy of the developing world through their own programs, of which Canada is a pioneer. Already, the United States, Britain and another of other developed countries have already followed Canada’s lead.
Canada will lose out at its own game if it doesn’t get the FIIP in shape, Mr. Leblanc said.
“Over the next two years, you’ll have at least half a dozen new countries going after the very upwardly mobile wealthy individuals who want access to new citizenship.”

Leave us a message

Check our online courses now

Check our online courses now
Click Here now!!!!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Vcita