Saskatchewan Businesses Hire 280 Irish Workers



Province of Manitoba in Canada
Province of Manitoba in Canada (Photo credit: Wikipedia)
Canadian Provinces and Territories
Canadian Provinces and Territories (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Businesses in Saskatchewan have hired over 280 skilled workers from Ireland. This is a direct result of a March 2012 recruitment mission, in which provincial officials and representatives from 27 Saskatchewan employers traveled to Ireland in search of employees.
“The response from Ireland was both positive and sobering,” said provincial immigration minister Rob Norris. “While thousands of people in Ireland continue to look for opportunities in Canada and elsewhere, we are pleased to be able to invite more than 280 of the skilled applicants to come and discover the Saskatchewan advantage”.
The province is one of many in Canada that is seeing a continued economic boom accompanied by a shortage in skilled labour. It was this need for skilled labour that inspired officials to travel to Ireland in an effort to recruit Irish workers looking for employment in key industries. This is part of a larger trend of some Canadian provinces looking outside the country’s borders for labourers who can help to grow the country’s economy.


Enhanced by Zemanta

Federal Skilled Worker Cap Reached

As of yesterday, 8 May 2012, the maximum number of 10,000 Federal Skilled Worker applications has been reached. This cap on applications has been put in place for individuals applying under one of the 29 eligible occupations being targeted by Citizenship and Immigration Canada.
Unless new Ministerial instructions are received, the cap will re-open on 1 July 2012.
This limit does not apply to all applicants to the Federal Skilled Worker program. Those with an offer of arranged employment are still welcome to apply. Individuals who are pursuing or have completed a PhD program in Canada may still apply as well. The cap for PhD applicants is 1,000, and currently 657 applications to this stream have been received.

Enhanced by Zemanta

Federal Internship for Newcomers Program Expands to Private Businesses

Tour CIBC in Montreal.
Tour CIBC in Montreal. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The Government of Canada has partnered with two leading private Canadian businesses to develop and expand the Federal Internship for Newcomers Program (FIN).
CGI Group Inc, a leading information technology company, and CIBC, a top financial services business, have partnered with the government to hire foreign workers through the FIN program. The program assists new immigrants to Canada in finding temporary or permanent work in their fields of study.
Since September 2010, the FIN program has assisted over 130 newcomers in finding work in Canada. Before the partnerships with CIBC and CGI Group Inc, work was offered in federal departments and agencies.
“Lack of Canadian work experience can prevent many newcomers from successfully integrating into the labour market,” said Citizenship and Immigration Minister Jason Kenney. “This program is an excellent example of the Federal government’s leadership role in helping immigrants enter the Canadian workforce”.
Through the program, CIBC and CGI Group Inc will be able to review the profiles of newcomers whose work readiness has already been assessed by the government. It is hoped that this partnership will allow the companies to gain key employees, and help immigrants gain valuable Canadian work experience as they continue to establish themselves in their new home.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Immigration for dummies: What transformational change means for newcomers

BY TOBI COHEN, POSTMEDIA NEWS



OTTAWA — Trying to make sense of Canada's complicated and seemingly ever-changing immigration system can be a taxing exercise.
From legislative amendments to regulatory changes, from proposals to studies, from ministerial instructions to pilot projects, Immigration Minister Jason Kenney has promised "transformational change" but has released details of the government's plan piecemeal, muddying the waters even further.
With sweeping new refugee legislation set to pass at the end of June and plans introduced in the budget to do away with a burdensome backlog of old skilled worker applications, Postmedia News has attempted to dissect just what's in store in the weeks, months and years to come for the approximately 250,000 newcomers who arrive in Canada annually, and why Canadians should care.
What kind of immigration system does the federal government want?
The government wants to implement a fast and flexible, just-in-time system that's focused on the bottom line and attracts workers with the language skills needed to hit the ground running, employment credentials the labour market demands and Canadian experience. Canada's first-come, first-served system appears to be on its way out.
Canada would remain open to those facing persecution but seeks more control over who is granted asylum and will not tolerate those who jump the queue by arriving at the border illegally, en masse and via human smuggling operations.
Family reunification remains important but there's a sense it can be achieved in a way that doesn't burden Canada's health care system.
What are the problems the Tories are trying to fix?
Without hard caps on application intake, massive backlogs arose, particularly in the economic and family streams. This has led to wait times that exceeded seven years. Furthermore, individuals in the economic steams are often being admitted based on skills Canada was looking for when they applied, but that are no longer relevant years later —which ultimately undermines their employability.
Backlogs have appeared also in the refugee stream due, in part, to a shortage of Immigration and Refugee Board adjudicators. As of April 25, 32 vacancies remained on the 164-member board, according to figures provided to Postmedia News.
During a recent speech at an immigration and settlement conference in Toronto, Kenney identified a number of other deficiencies. For one, newcomers to Canada were experiencing high unemployment and low income levels. Statistics Canada figures suggest immigrants who arrived in 2004 were three times more likely to have low incomes.
Most would settle in major cities like Toronto, Montreal and Vancouver even if there were no jobs there and they tended to have low levels of language proficiency. According to Statistics Canada, 60 per cent of newcomers scored below Level 3 on the International Adult Literacy and Skills Survey, which is "considered the desired threshold for coping with the increasing skill demands of a knowledge society."
What is the government doing about backlogs?
Budget 2012 will eliminate a backlog of about 300,000 skilled workers who applied to come to Canada before 2008. Collectively, these individuals will be refunded some $130 million and are being told to reapply under changes to the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that were introduced in 2008. Among the changes are new powers for the minister to cap application intake and fast-track more desirable applicants. A post-2008 backlog of about 160,000 applications remains but the government says wait times are generally six months to a year instead of five years. Without the changes, the government estimates the backlog would have reached 850,000 this year.
Last fall, the government announced a two-year moratorium on new parent and grandparent sponsorship applications in a bid to eliminate within five years a backlog that had grown to more than 165,000. The government receives about 40,000 of these applications a year and has estimated that wait times would exceed 10 years and the backlog would grow to 300,000 by the end of the decade nothing is changed. The government also vowed to admit 25,000 parents and grandparents this year, 10,000 more than it planned to admit in 2011. Kenney promised to maintain those acceptance levels, which he said are the highest in nearly two decades.
It's not clear what will happen to the backlog of about 88,555 immigrant investors and 10,000 would-be entrepreneurs, as both those programs are being overhauled.
The government has temporarily shelved the entrepreneur program and introduced a 700-application-a-year cap on the investor program. Caps have also been introduced for privately sponsored refugees and skilled workers without prearranged offers of employment.
What's in store for economic immigrants?
Economic immigrants — those chosen for their employment skills — account for about 62 per cent of newcomers. Changes are coming to the points-based selection system for federal skilled workers so that priority is given to young people, those with strong language proficiency and individuals that have already secured a job. The government is also giving temporary foreign workers and international students more credit for the Canadian experience they have acquired by making it easier for them to become permanent residents.
Efforts are underway to assess the credentials of newcomers before they come to Canada to prevent the sorts of job market disconnects that force doctors to drive cabs. So far, Canada can assess the credentials of architects, engineers, financial auditors and accountants, medical laboratory technologists, occupational therapists, pharmacists, physiotherapists and registered nurses. Six more occupations will be added to the list by the end of the year.
The provinces also are playing a larger role in choosing immigrants who can meet local labour market shortages. While the Provincial Nominee Program is designed to fill low-skilled jobs, Kenney has said it's also been used to address, for example, lawyer shortages in Saskatchewan. Government figures suggest about 42,000 people will be accepted through the program this year compared to just 8,000 in 2005.
Eventually the provinces, as well as employers, will be given access to the skilled worker inventory so they can cherry-pick workers to have their applications fast-tracked.
What's in store for family class immigrants?
The family class accounts for about a quarter of all admissions. In November, the government introduced a new 10-year, multiple-entry 'supervisa' that would allow parents and grandparents to visit their loved ones in Canada for up to two years at a time. Applicants must meet minimum annual income requirements, must have demonstrated they have financial support while in Canada and have medical clearance and proof of private health insurance. Meant as a backstop while the government eliminates the sponsorship backlog, questions have been raised about health care costs associated with this stream and a Commons committee has called for the supervisa to be made permanent.
Meanwhile, to crack down on marriage fraud, the government has introduced a five-year sponsorship bar to prevent newcomer spouses from sponsoring a new partner while their Canadian spouse is still financially responsible for them. A conditional permanent residency provision is also in the works to deter people in newer relationships from attempting to gain quick entry to Canada when they have no plans to remain with their sponsoring partner. The idea calls for sponsored partners in a marriage or common-law relationship of less than two years to be subject to a conditional two-year period of permanent residence.
What's in store for refugees?
Refugees account for just under 10 per cent of admissions. The government seems to favour those who apply to come to Canada from overseas refugee camps rather than those who arrive at the border seeking asylum. The new Protecting Canada's Immigration System Act is poised to become law in Canada by the end of June.
Under Bill C-31, the minister would be able to declare certain countries as "safe" — which means refugee applications from those countries would be fast-tracked and bogus claimants deported more quickly.
The move is supposed to help deal with a spike in European claims, the bulk of them by members of Hungary's Roma population. Last year, the number of claims from Hungary nearly doubled to 4,409 — though most were withdrawn, abandoned or rejected.
Noting it can take 4 1/2 years to remove a bogus claimant, Kenney has said the new bill would reduce the number of delay tactics currently available to claimants. For example, they no longer would be able to apply to stay in Canada on humanitarian and compassionate grounds so long as their refugee claim is pending. Those from so-called safe countries would also be barred from accessing the new Refuge Appeal Division.
Those who arrive in Canada en masse or via human smuggling operations would also face a tough road as so-called "irregular arrivals" would be subject to detention for at least 14 days before their case is reviewed. Successful claimants would also be barred from applying for permanent residence and sponsoring a loved one for five years.
Why should you care?
You're a stakeholder directly affected by immigration policy and immigration is what's fuelling population growth in this country. Immigration currently accounts for about two-thirds of population growth. Without it, Statistics Canada predicts growth could be close to zero within 20 years.
Some believe population growth is key to a country's success and its ability to maintain a strong labour force. Others argue population decline could actually be a good thing for the environment and the economy given the high rates of unemployment that still exist in parts of Canada.
Twitter.com/tobicohen

Harnessing Immigrant Mobility Means Prosperity for All Canadians


From Tuesday's Globe and Mail

More than a century ago, the debate about migration in the West was largely settled. Migration was seen to be a boon to the economic fortunes of countries, and many states eliminated unnecessary obstacles to movement such as passports and visas. Britain, after calling for the use of passports in its 1836 Aliens Restrictions Act, later eliminated them in 1872.

The argument was simple, according to Giovanni Bolis, a late-19th-century Italian legal commentator: Passports should be eliminated “not merely as a homage to the civility of the times … but as a measure of great importance for economic relations, favouring commerce, industry and progress, facilitating the relations among the various countries, and liberating travellers from harassment and hindrances.”
Such a view would be considered radical by today’s standards, but the 19th-century insight that immigration and economic growth go hand-in-hand has returned to conventional thinking in Canada. The evidence is certainly strong. A recent OECD study found that increased immigration is accompanied by increases in total employment and GDP growth. In the United States, studies find that migration increases the rate of invention, and in Canada, first-generation immigrants are 20 per cent more likely to have started a business.
The truth is that migrants are, as a population, exceptional people. And it is the qualities of migrants – not just their education and skills – that benefit our economy and society. Those people who elect to move abroad are, by nature or by choice, often willing to tolerate more risk and ambiguity in their pursuit of opportunity. In their Canadian workplaces, they are “divergent thinkers” whose different ways of viewing the world can challenge the status quo and stimulate new approaches to problems. Migrants often bring cross-cultural skills and international networks, assets to Canada’s economy in an age of global integration.
In short, the key innovation advantage conferred by higher rates of migration is also its greatest risk. Migrants are disruptive. They often bring different ways of thinking, different ways of doing things and an aspirational drive. These qualities make migration essential to the future prosperity of Canada, but they also point to the destabilizing effect of rapid change.
When Clifford Sifton launched the Last Best West campaign in the late 19th century to attract migrants to Western Canada, he assumed that they would travel there and then settle. In our hyper-connected world, however, migrants rarely move only once. The computer programmer who moves from Bangalore to Waterloo may pack up in five or 10 years to return home. For most people, migration is temporary, repeated or circular. Indeed, according to the Asia Pacific Foundation, about 2.8 million Canadian citizens now live overseas.
Realizing the economic gains of migration, therefore, requires attention to a broader spectrum of policy issues than the worthy goal of reforming visa processes for the highly skilled. Vibrant, cutting-edge industries and universities should be nurtured so that Canada can attract, train and employ the best and brightest. Cities and schools need the resources to manage the consequences of greater diversity and mobility. In brief, migration and mobility should be mainstreamed into domestic policy frameworks.
Canada can also consider the role of its foreign policy, in particular by supporting a rules-based system to govern global migration. Many migrant-sending countries have long supported proposals for closer international co-operation on migration, including better human-rights protections for migrant workers, and Canada could emerge as an influential advocate for better global migration governance. Doing so would not only help to improve current ad hoc approaches, it would send a message to the world that Canada embraces the contribution migrants make to its own society and economy. This kind of leadership would also cement Canada’s position as a preferred destination for the world’s aspiring workers, thinkers and innovators.
Prosperity in the 21st century will come to those countries that are able to recognize and harness the benefits of greater global mobility. Reforming Canada’s immigration policy is a good first step, but more movement is necessary.
Geoffrey Cameron and Ian Goldin are co-authors of Exceptional People: How Migration Shaped Our World and Will Define Our Future.

Conservatives’ wage model will hurt all workers, unions say


Les WhittingtonOttawa Bureau
“Employers will benefit by having a pliable workforce available at a moment’s notice,” commented Naveen Mehta, general counsel and director of human rights with United Food and Commercial Workers Canada (UFCW).
He said the main thrust of the budget changes is to help business.
Hassan Yussuff, secretary-treasurer of the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC), said the Conservatives’ new measures will exert a “terrible downward pressure” on all workers’ wages in this country.
Full details of the new regime are only dribbling out, but the changes have already raised alarms among opposition MPs and some economists.
Of greatest concern, say critics, is the government’s move to allow employers to pay temporary highly-skilled foreign workers up to 15 per cent less (for low-skilled workers, it’s up to 5 per cent less) than the prevailing local wage under some circumstances. (The reduced wage threshold measures do not apply to temporary farm workers).
Human Resources Minister Diane Finley says the lower wages can be paid to temporary foreign workers only if the Canadian business’ other Canadian employees accept the same pay. But there is an important exception: If a company once had Canadian employees who were being paid below the average local wage but no longer has Canadian workers, as many temporary foreign workers as needed can be brought in and paid at up to 15 per cent below the local going rate, officials have disclosed.
The unions say the government is creating an unwieldy, confusing and unfair system for determining the wages of the increasing army of temporary workers from abroad now coming to Canada.
And critics say the new approach is a discriminatory system that flies in the face of Canadians’ commitment to fairness.
“Canada’s laws don’t support wage discrimination based on where you come from,” says Yasmeen Khan of MIGRANTE-Canada, an alliance of organizations supporting Filipino migrants, who comprise the largest number of temporary workers in Canada.
“Many people recognize the majority of migrant workers are people of colour and oppose wage discrimination based on race.”
Alyson Queen, a spokesperson for Finley, said the unions are misleading Canadians by saying that all temporary foreign workers will be paid less than Canadians. In most cases, she said, the new rules will ensure employers pay foreign workers the same as Canadian employees.
But union representatives say that, instead of reducing wages for temporary workers, the federal government should be expanding immigration quotas to allow skilled foreign employees to stay in Canada permanently. It does not improve the country’s long-term economic prospects to train thousands of foreign workers and then throw them out of the country after three or four years, said Mehta, of UFCW.
Concerns were also raised about measures in the budget legislation intended to pressure EI recipients to loosen their criteria for suitable employment.
On Monday, Flaherty confirmed the government intends to clamp down on EI claimants.
Flaherty said the government will expand the threshold for what is considered a suitable job for EI recipients. That means that those who pass up such employment could lose their EI benefits.
“There’ll be a broader definition and people will have to engage more in the workforce,” Flaherty told reporters.
He also indicated that he has little sympathy for EI recipients who are too picky about the jobs they will accept.
There is no bad job — the only bad job is not having a job,” he said.
Yussuff, of the CLC, said Flaherty “wasn’t thinking” when he made those remarks about jobs.
“Canadians to a large extent want to go work, but they also want to be paid a decent salary when they go to work,” Yussuff said Tuesday.
The expected changes to EI rules reflect complaints by Conservative cabinet ministers in recent months that Canadians are passing up jobs such as Christmas tree harvesting and leaving employers to bring in foreign workers to do the jobs. But opposition MPs say it’s a waste of peoples’ skills to force them to take positions for which they are over-qualified.
In the Commons later Tuesday, the NDP demanded more information on the planned changes to EI eligibility rules and asked whether the unemployed will be forced to take jobs well below their skill level.
Citing Flaherty’s remarks on jobs, NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair asked, “Does the prime minister actually agree that our teachers and our nurses should be taking jobs driving taxis rather than being given a chance to look for work in their own field?”
Prime Minister Stephen Harper replied that Canada’s job-creation record in recent years has been among the best in the industrialized world and the government wants this trend to continue.
“We anticipate the labour shortage is going to be a serious concern in the Canadian economy in the years to come and we want to make sure all Canadians have the opportunity” to work, Harper told the Commons.
Finley later provided a bit more information on how the EI changes will work. She said concerns that unemployed Canadians will be pressured to take jobs far from their homes are unfounded. “Canadians will be expected to take jobs appropriate to their skill level — in their area,” Finley said.

Sask Chamber of Commerce policies to smooth process for skilled immigrants


Reported by Stephanie Froese
Change text size: + -
It’s a complex world for Saskatchewan’s business community when taking into consideration the vast policy resolutions being implemented by the Saskatchewan Chamber of Commerce (SCC).

Steve McLellan, CEO of the SCC said all of the resolutions voted on at a recent board meeting in Saskatoon carried significant importance.

One policy voted in aims to bring Labour Market Opinion (LMO) processing back to Saskatchewan.

The LMO is a government document that immigrant skilled workers need in order to obtain a working visa. 

A recent decision by the federal government saw the LMO offices move to Vancouver in an efficiency effort for western Canada.  The Vancouver offices now take LMO application from Saskatchewan, Manitoba and BC.

McLellan said that move caught everybody in Saskatchewan by surprise.

“They thought it would be an efficiency move. We’ve disagreed with that and we’ve been very clear with them on that challenge, as have our members and immigration consultants. We need to get that changed. We need local response times,” said McLellan.

McLellan said immigration of skilled workers is front of mind for most business people in Saskatchewan.

Having LMO processing back in Saskatchewan would be more convenient and more approachable for those workers, he said.

“There are individuals, both businesses as well as immigrants, who need to have access to those people and now with it being so far away there’s time zone issues as well there’s telecommunications issues of connecting with them,” said McLellan.

He said the SCC wants to use its influence to try to make the process as slick as possible while maintaining necessary safe guards. He said they are very confident that the LMO processing could come back to Saskatchewan.

Other policy resolutions focusing on the environment that were adopted during the Saskatoon meeting will have a bigger long term impact, said McLellan.

Among the 15 resolutions was a focus on better water management and a recovery strategy for woodland caribou. McLellen said these resolutions may not be well known to the general public but have big interest from environmental groups, the mining organizations. He said a water management strategy currently being worked on by the provincial government is a process the SCC has been very close to.

The federal and provincial political relms have the final say on changes the SCC would like to see implemented but McLellan said they have the mindset that if the SCC does their job right then policy will follow their guidelines.

“We go into each of the policy sessions with the belief that if we do our research correctly and we consult our members and the experts in the fields that we will have an awful lot of influence simply because it’s the best thinking on the particular issue,” said McLellan.

Immigration is Destroying Canada?


By Author: Max Chaudhary | May 8, 2012

The Globe and Mail recently published an article that advocated an increase in the amount of immigrants to Canada. As a Toronto immigration lawyer, I find the online comments section of such articles strangely compelling. The vast majority of the comments were anti-immigrant, some parochially and even racially so. One compelling example included a post which contained a link to an RCMP most wanted list – a list with pictures, the majority of whom were visible minorities. Such an assertion cannot be reconciled with the steady reduction of crime in Canada since the 70s despite the opening up of immigration to Canada during that period.
The article is no doubt portraying a positive view of immigration to Canada, focusing on the success of Steinbach, Manitoba, a small town, in integrating immigrants. This has resulted in the growth of the town. Astute commenters pointed out that the majority of immigrants don’t settle in small towns but rather, in Canada’s three or four largest cities (which drives up real estate values and strains infrastructure in those aforementioned cities).
There were also highly praised comments which were from self-confessed old codgers, who bemoaned the older, central neighbourhoods in Vancouver which have been apparently overrun by hoards of Asian people with large amounts of money.
The appeal to environmental degradation was cited (i.e. that more resources shall be polluted and farmland shall be paved over with subdivisions); this is a logical argument given that the current immigration and Refugee Protection Act (at section 3) is utterly silent on safeguarding the environment. However, given the dearth of investment and research into green jobs economic growth shall inevitably be tied to environmental degradation for the near future. Canadians state that they care about the environment, but behaviour suggests that care only insofar as it does not negatively impact their living standards. Perhaps pro-environmental advocates can push for a change to Canada’s immigration laws. I wish them the best of luck.
Another logical argument for reducing immigration was the assertion that there should be more encouragement for Canada’s youth to take up the skilled blue collar jobs that pay a decent wage, and a corresponding discouragement for certain children to enter university (which would theoretically reduce the need to import foreign plumbers and electricians). This is something that cannot be legislated, and moreover, this won’t address the fact Canadians do not want to work in low skilled jobs such as a Tim Horton’s in Alberta. I have seen firsthand the efforts by Tim Horton’s franchisees in Alberta who offer a higher wage resulting in little or no response from the Canadian-born labour market; the reason? – Local Canadians don’t want to work the night shift.
The fact that 2nd generation immigrants are as a group successfully integrated into Canadian society was ignored, due in part because such good news does not make for selling newspapers. Such good news is only apparent if one looks at specialized literature from academics such as Arthur Sweetman. News media compete for your attention by highlighting the dramatic problems of life like murder and sex and terrorism: if it bleeds, it leads. Thus, those without the life experience of meeting and interacting with different peoples, those only acquainted with minorities through a mug-shot on a police website come to caricatures and generalizations about minorities.
The more reasonable position taken on the online comments section was to reduce economic immigration during an economic downturn. This may make sense.

Canada wipes Federal Skilled Worker Program backlog

Canada
Canada (Photo credit: palindrome6996)

Around 280,000 applicants to Canada’s Federal Skilled Worker Program are to have their fees refunded as part of a bid to create a fast and flexible immigration system. The March Budget 2012 set aside 130 million Canadian dollars to cover the cost of refunds and clear the astonishing backlog of unprocessed applications.
Jason Diggs, Sales Director for Anglo Pacific, explains, “The applicants affected are those who applied prior to 27 February 2008 and are thought to number around 280,000. They will be encouraged to re-apply under new programs that focus on work skills – a similar path to the Australians who will replace their points system with SkillSelect from 1 July 2012. The 20,000 applicants who have already passed the selection criteria stage will continue to have their applications processed. Of course this is a major blow to the 280,000 people who have been held in limbo for four or five years or more as a refund will set them back to square one, however the replacement skills-based system promises to be quicker and more efficient.”
The phased-out Federal Skilled Worker Program is set to be substituted for a Federal Job Bank where skilled migrant applications will go into an online selection pool. Employers and provincial governments will then be able to dip into the pool and pick the best-fit employees to fast-track through the application process to get them working within months rather than years. This will give Canada the ability to focus on the skills and talents that the country needs today. Legislation will be needed to establish the new Federal Job Bank system and could take up to two years to implement.
Canada has a growing demand for skilled workers, particularly in Western Canada’s booming resources sector. Canadian Business this month revealed the 50 best-paying highest-demand career choices today. They surveyed hundreds of occupations tracked by Statistics Canada and placed Petroleum Engineer as the number one job to seek, or indeed keep. This is both the fastest-growing occupation in Canada, with employment increasing by 85% between 2006 and 2011, and the second-highest in pay. Oil is Canada’s largest driver of employment and economic activity and the Canadian Business list also ranks other oil-related jobs highly such as chemical and civil engineers and environmental and occupational safety inspectors. Construction is another sector crying out for skilled workers.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Leave us a message

Check our online courses now

Check our online courses now
Click Here now!!!!

Subscribe to our newsletter

Vcita